Improved survival and MRD remission with blinatumomab vs. chemotherapy in children with first high-risk relapse B-ALL | Leukemia – Nature.com

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA
Leukemia (2022)
58 Accesses
1 Altmetric
Metrics details
For children with high-risk, first-relapse B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) after achieving a second complete remission (CR) remains the best, potentially curative treatment [1, 2]. In addition, a minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status at the end of consolidation is an important prognostic indicator as demonstrated in the Children’s Oncology Group Studies AALL1131 (high risk) and AALL0932 (standard risk), and ALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 studies [1, 3]. Blinatumomab, a CD3/CD19-directed bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE®) molecule, demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile prior to/after alloHSCT in patients with relapsed/refractory B-ALL in clinical trials and real-world experience studies [4,5,6], with early termination of enrollment in phase 3 trials in young adults and children because of blinatumomab benefit [4, 6]. In the phase 3 trial in pediatric high-risk, first-relapse B-ALL, blinatumomab consolidation pre-alloHSCT resulted in improved event-free survival (EFS) and MRD remission vs. chemotherapy, with EFS benefit consistently found in all subgroups, including those with extramedullary disease and very early relapse (<18 months) [6]. Enrollment was terminated for EFS benefit of blinatumomab (p < 0.001) per independent data monitoring committee’s (DMC) recommendation based on the July 2019 datacut. Follow-up data presented here are from September 2021, with overall survival (OS) benefit becoming apparent with longer follow-up.
In this open-label, phase 3 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02393859) [6], eligible patients were children with Philadelphia chromosome–negative, high-risk, first-relapse B-ALL post-induction and 2 consolidation cycles achieving an M1 (<5% blasts) or M2 (≥5% and <25% blasts) bone marrow [6]. Patients were randomized to receive either a third consolidation cycle with blinatumomab (15 μg/m2/day, 4 weeks, intravenous) or chemotherapy according to the IntReALL HR 2010 protocol [7]; children achieving/maintaining a second CR (M1 marrow) were eligible for alloHSCT. There were no restrictions on preparative regimen, donors, or stem cell source for alloHSCT.
The primary endpoint was EFS; events were relapse or M2 marrow post-CR, failure to achieve morphological CR at the end of treatment, second malignancy, or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. OS was the key secondary efficacy endpoint. Analysis was intent to treat, i.e., per randomization, including all patients for efficacy and those receiving protocol-specified therapy for safety. The trial protocol was approved by each center’s ethics committee/institutional review board. Parents or legal guardians provided written informed consent. Trial data were available to all authors and analyzed at Amgen.
Between November 2015 and August 2019, 111 patients were randomized (blinatumomab: 54, chemotherapy: 57) at 47 centers in 13 countries; data from the primary analysis with data cutoff of July 17, 2019, including 108 patients have been reported previously [6]. Enrollment was terminated for blinatumomab benefit (p < 0.001) per DMC’s recommendation (July 2019 analysis of ~1/2 of total EFS events). Data cutoff for this updated analysis clean snapshot was September 20, 2021. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two randomization groups; notably, all patients randomized to blinatumomab received blinatumomab, while five patients randomized to chemotherapy did not receive it (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).
After a median follow-up of 44 months, EFS was significantly improved with blinatumomab vs. chemotherapy with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.35 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.20–0.61, stratified log-rank p < 0.001, 4-year Kaplan–Meier estimates: 59% vs. 27%) (Fig. 1). EFS benefit was seen in all pre-specified subgroups, including very early relapse (i.e., <18 months from diagnosis) or extramedullary disease (probably due to better systemic control, although blinatumomab can cross the blood-brain barrier, and low concentrations of blinatumomab have been detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with relapsed/refractory ALL [8]), and independent of baseline MRD (i.e., after 2 cycles of consolidation therapy). With longer follow-up, blinatumomab now demonstrates a strong benefit also for OS, with an HR of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.17–0.69, stratified log-rank p = 0.002, 4-year Kaplan–Meier estimates: 77% vs. 49%); previously, in the July 2019 primary analysis, the OS HR was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.18–1.01) [6]. EFS, OS, and MRD remission (<10−4 blasts by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or flow-cytometry if PCR data were not available) were all improved with blinatumomab, both overall and independent of baseline MRD (< or ≥10−3) (Table 1), with >90% of MRD remissions achieved by day 15 [9]. This is particularly interesting, as day 15 MRD responses to blinatumomab in children with relapsed/refractory B-ALL were shown to predict response [10]. Further details on MRD response in the two randomization arms have been recently published [9]. A higher frequency of patients in the blinatumomab vs. chemotherapy arms proceeded to alloHSCT (94% vs. 68%).
A Survival probability over time is shown by treatment arm, i.e., blinatumomab or chemotherapy, for both event-free survival (left panel) and overall survival (right panel). Censoring indicated by circles and triangles for blinatumomab and chemotherapy, respectively. CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio. B Event-free survival hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals are shown for subgroups as indicated. *Stratification by marrow status (M1) at randomization and MRD after induction therapy. HR for M2 was not evaluable (n = 4 in each arm). BM bone marrow, CI confidence interval, EM extramedullary, EFS event-free survival, HR hazard ratio, MRD minimal residual disease.
Second relapses occurred in 17/54 (31%) blinatumomab and 35/57 (61%) chemotherapy patients (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). With blinatumomab, second relapses with extramedullary disease occurred in 6/54 (11%) patients, with central nervous system (CNS) involvement in 6 (11%); three patients had isolated extramedullary relapse (all solely CNS). With chemotherapy, second relapses with extramedullary disease occurred in 9/57 (16%) patients, with CNS involvement in 3 (5%); five patients had isolated extramedullary relapse (2 solely CNS). Late events (≥2 years on study) were all due to relapses. For the four blinatumomab patients with relapse 2–4.4 years on study, two had relapse in the CNS and two in the bone marrow; these relapses occurred 1.9–4.3 years post-alloHSCT. There was one chemotherapy patient with combined bone marrow and CNS relapse at 2.6 years on study and 2.5 years post-alloHSCT. CD19-negative relapse rates were low after both blinatumomab (2/54, 4%) and chemotherapy (1/57, 2%). CAR-T cell therapy after relapse post-study therapy was reported for 4/54 blinatumomab patients and 12/57 chemotherapy patients; 5 of the 12 chemotherapy patients received blinatumomab after developing relapsed/refractory disease and prior to CAR-T cells. In this small dataset, we did not observe evidence suggesting an adverse impact of blinatumomab on subsequent CAR-T cells.
Adverse events (AEs) were consistent with those reported in the primary analysis (Supplementary Table 3) [6]. No AE deaths were recorded. Grade ≥3 AE rates were 61% with blinatumomab and 83% with chemotherapy. There was no grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS); CRS was reported in 1 chemotherapy patient (grade 1) and 2 blinatumomab patients (grade 1: 1, grade 2: 1). Grade ≥3 neurologic events were reported in 4 patients (blinatumomab: 3, chemotherapy: 1). In the blinatumomab arm, there were 2 patients with grade 3 events (neuropathic pain worsening to grade 3 following transplantation, unrelated to blinatumomab; treatment-related grade 3 dysphasia/depressed level of consciousness (study day 2) that resolved with blinatumomab discontinuation) and 1 patient with a grade 4 seizure (study days 2–3, resolved with blinatumomab discontinuation). In the chemotherapy arm, 1 patient had grade 3 confusion study days 3–5 attributed to ifosfamide, administration of which was interrupted.
Although there is heterogeneity in assessing CD19-negative relapse rates, when using treated patients as the denominator, low rates of CD19-negative relapse have been reported in blinatumomab trials of children [4, 5, 11] and adults [12, 13], with 1 analysis showing that reduced CD19 expression with blinatumomab was transient [14]. Other studies have shown that prior blinatumomab does not affect responses to CAR-T cells and vice versa [15]. Thus, the literature to date indicates that CD19 expression is preserved after blinatumomab treatment for the vast majority of patients who have relapsed, indicating that most would be eligible for subsequent anti-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy.
In conclusion, as compared with chemotherapy, treatment with blinatumomab for consolidation cycle 3 therapy pre-alloHSCT resulted in improved OS, EFS, and MRD remission rates, independent of baseline MRD, in children with high-risk first-relapse B-ALL. EFS benefit with blinatumomab was seen in all subgroups, including those with very early relapse and extramedullary disease. Extramedullary relapse rate was similar in blinatumomab and chemotherapy arms. The incidence of CD19-negative relapse was low in both treatment arms. The previously described better safety profile of blinatumomab treatment was confirmed with longer follow-up data. Whether earlier administration of blinatumomab therapy in the treatment course could provide additional benefit in this patient population remains to be explored.
Qualified researchers may request data from Amgen clinical studies. Complete details are available at the following: http://www.amgen.com/datasharing.
Eckert C, Parker C, Moorman AV, Irving JAE, Kirschner-Schwabe R, Groeneveld-Krentz S, et al. Risk factors and outcomes in children with high-risk B-cell precursor and T-cell relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: combined analysis of ALLR3 and ALL-REZ BFM 2002 clinical trials. Eur J Cancer. 2021;151:175–89.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Locatelli F, Schrappe M, Bernardo ME, Rutella S. How I treat relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2012;120:2807–16.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Salzer WL, Burke MJ, Devidas M, Dai Y, Heerema NA, Carroll AJ, et al. Minimal residual disease at end of induction and consolidation remain important prognostic indicators for newly diagnosed children and young adults with very high-risk (VHR) B-lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL): Children’s Oncology Group AALL1131. Abstract from the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:10004.
Article  Google Scholar 
Brown PA, Ji L, Xu X, Devidas M, Hogan LE, Borowitz MJ, et al. Effect of postreinduction therapy consolidation with blinatumomab vs chemotherapy on disease-free survival in children, adolescents, and young adults with first relapse of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325:833–42.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Locatelli F, Zugmaier G, Mergen N, Bader P, Jeha S, Schlegel PG, et al. Blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of the RIALTO trial, an expanded access study. Blood Cancer J. 2020;10:77.
Article  Google Scholar 
Locatelli F, Zugmaier G, Rizzari C, Morris JD, Gruhn B, Klingebiel T, et al. Effect of blinatumomab vs chemotherapy on event-free survival among children with high-risk first-relapse B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325:843–54.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Möricke A, Zimmermann M, Valsecchi MG, Stanulla M, Biondi A, Mann G, et al. Dexamethasone vs prednisone in induction treatment of pediatric ALL: results of the randomized trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000. Blood. 2016;127:2101–12.
Article  Google Scholar 
Klinger M, Zugmaier G, Nägele V, Goebeler M-E, Brandl C, Stelljes M, et al. Adhesion of T cells to endothelial cells facilitates blinatumomab-associated neurologic adverse events. Cancer Res. 2020;80:91–101.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Locatelli F, Eckert C, Hrusak O, Buldini B, Sartor M, Zugmaier G, et al. Blinatumomab overcomes poor prognostic impact of measurable residual disease in pediatric high-risk first relapse B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022;69:e29715.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Brown P, Zugmaier G, Gore L, Tuglus CA, von Stackelberg A. Day 15 bone marrow minimal residual disease predicts response to blinatumomab in relapsed/refractory paediatric B-ALL. Br J Haematol. 2020;188:e36–9.
Article  Google Scholar 
Mejstrikova E, Klinger M, Markovic A, Zugmaier G, Locatelli F. CD19 expression in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia pre- and post-treatment with blinatumomab. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68:e29323.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Goekbuget N, Zugmaier G, Klinger M, Kufer P, Stelljes M, Viardot A, et al. Long-term relapse-free survival in a phase 2 study of blinatumomab for the treatment of patients with minimal residual disease in B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Haematologica. 2017;102:e132–5.
Article  Google Scholar 
Jabbour E, Dull J, Yilmaz M, Khoury JD, Ravandi F, Jain N, et al. Outcome of patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia after blinatumomab failure: no change in the level of CD19 expression. Am J Hematol. 2018;93:371–4.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Queudeville M, Schlegel P, Heinz AT, Lenz T, Doring M, Holzer U, et al. Blinatumomab in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Eur J Haematol. 2020;106:473–83.
Article  Google Scholar 
Wudhikarn K, Flynn JR, Rivière I, Gonen M, Wang X, Senechal B, et al. Interventions and outcomes of adult patients with B-ALL progressing after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. Blood. 2021;138:531–43.
Article  CAS  Google Scholar 
Download references
This study was conducted and funded by Amgen Inc. Susanna Mac, MD, PhD, who wrote the first draft, and Brittany L. Phillips, PhD, both of Amgen Inc. provided medical writing support.
IRCCS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
Franco Locatelli & Luciana Vinti
Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH, Munich, Germany
Gerhard Zugmaier
MBBM Foundation, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
Carmelo Rizzari
Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Joan D. Morris, Yi Zeng & William N. Kormany
Universitaetsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany
Bernd Gruhn
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
Thomas Klingebiel
Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale Santobono Pausilipon, Napoli, Italy
Rosanna Parasole
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
Christin Linderkamp
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Christian Flotho
Hopital Armand Trousseau, APHP.Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
Arnaud Petit
Istituto Pediatrico di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico G Gaslini, Genova, Italy
Concetta Micalizzi
IQVIA Inc., Durham, NC, USA
Rajendra Desai
Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum Pädiatrie m.S. Onkologie/Hämatologie, Berlin, Germany
Cornelia Eckert
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
Anja Möricke
Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Mary Sartor
Charles University Prague University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
Ondrej Hrusak
St. Anna Children’s Hospital, Children’s Cancer Research Institute, Vienna, Austria
Christina Peters
Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
Vaskar Saha
Tata Translational Cancer Research Centre, Tata Medical Center, Kolkata, India
Vaskar Saha
Charité Universitaetsmedizin CVK Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Arend von Stackelberg
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
All authors were involved in data generation, analyzing the data, and reviewing the manuscript. FL had full access to the data in the study and final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.
Correspondence to Franco Locatelli.
FL reports advisory board membership for Amgen, Novartis, Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Neovii, Vertex, and is on the Speakers’ Bureau for Amgen, Novartis, Miltenyi, Medac, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Takeda, outside the submitted work. GZ, JDM, YZ, and WNK are employed by Amgen. GZ has patents 20190300609 and 20130323247 licensed. CR reports personal fees from Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Sobi, and grants and personal fees from Shire and Medac, outside the submitted work. RD supports Amgen as an employee of IQVIA. AM reports grants from Amgen during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Shire, outside the submitted work. CP reports membership on board of directors or advisory committee for Amgen, and travel support from Amgen, Neovii, Jazz, and Novartis, and Speakers’ Bureau for Riemser, Amgen, Novartis, and Medac. VS reports personal fees from Amgen during the conduct of the study. AvS reports personal fees from Amgen, Shire, Jazz, Roche, and MorphoSys, outside the submitted work. RP reports advisory board membership for Amgen, Novartis, and Shire and is on the Speakers’ Bureau for Jazz, Servier, and Amgen. BG, TK, CL, CF, AP, CM, CE, MS, OH, and LV have no disclosures.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Reprints and Permissions
Locatelli, F., Zugmaier, G., Rizzari, C. et al. Improved survival and MRD remission with blinatumomab vs. chemotherapy in children with first high-risk relapse B-ALL. Leukemia (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01770-3
Download citation
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-022-01770-3
Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative
Advertisement
Leukemia (Leukemia) ISSN 1476-5551 (online) ISSN 0887-6924 (print)
© 2022 Springer Nature Limited

source


0Shares

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published.